Technological slavery

Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has modified the world ceaselessly. Thanks to it, we can, for example, send info to the opposite finish of the world in seconds; discuss to individuals from different continents; travel to any place on the earth in one day; retailer 1000's of pictures on a drive the dimensions of your thumb; create digital realities, as well as do a bunch of different things that no one would have imagined just one hundred years ago.

But expertise has its unhealthy side too. In the present world, it's controlled by organizations who should not have our best interests in thoughts. They will not hesitate to make use of technology's great power towards us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the knowledge we obtain; emotional manipulation; modification of habits - those are just some issues expertise is getting used for lately. All that with more coverage, accuracy, effectiveness and with less human effort. If this "progress" is just not stopped, we are going to find yourself in a prison that we would not find in our worst nightmares.

I'll try to describe the best way the most important applied sciences of in the present day contribute to the creation of a global system of management. I may even mention a number of applied sciences of the future, and try to connect all the information collectively and predict the destiny of this world. Let's start with one of many innovations that have an effect on folks the most - The Internet.

The Internet

Every connection, for example sending a message, or getting into an internet site, goes by means of your Internet Service Provider, before it reaches the target. In concept this implies ISPs can freely spy on and modify the whole lot you do on the web; for instance - decelerate or block the downloading of torrents; inject commercials to your visited websites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-commercial-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a massive censorship system, like the so-known as "Great Wall" of China.

The most typical utilization of the Internet is searching websites, for which we use an internet browser resembling Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome. These three "giants" pretty much exist to gather data on their customers. Google a minimum of admits to it - alternatively, Mozilla pretends to care about your freedom and privateness, but truly spies on you and controls you. It's been a few years since Mozilla decided they are going to determine what add-ons you may and can't set up - apparently to "protect the users", however nothing stops them from, for instance, disabling AdBlock. Mozilla has worked with advertisers for a very long time - they've even proven them in your New Tab panel: https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-beneficial-platform-for-advertisers-content material-publishers-and-users/ (archive) (MozArchive). The myth of Firefox "respecting the person" has died and will not resurrect. Just read a certain reply from their webpage: Our merchandise do not interrupt the shopping experience; they catch users when they are most receptive to seeing new data. So, for them, you might be simply prey to be caught for the purpose of getting ads be shoved into your mind. Despite that, they nonetheless spew slogans about "respect and freedom". I may spend the entire article on stating all of the ways common web browsers exploit you. Opera, for instance, literally spies on your whole web history without your information. The three giants mentioned earlier also spy on you, however in some other methods.

Almost every huge webpage works intently with the police / government and can fortunately share knowledge about you with them - for example, the IP address of the computer you made a forum post from. Exceptions, akin to Lavabit (attention-grabbing story by the way - you possibly can learn it on the web) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided.

Lately, it grew to become fashionable to retailer your knowledge "within the cloud", for instance Dropbox or Google Drive. This is actually useful to the elites - they can now see and analyze your files, which can give them information about your interests or plans (which may very well be used in opposition to you). One man from 4chan was storing bomb making directions on Dropbox, solely to find that, sooner or later, they've been deleted. The Internet is filled with cases like that, and they don't seem to be all about bombs. Thus, we are able to see that your information is not safe on these cloud "services" - it ceases being yours. Almost certainly, in several years, wanting to maintain your data on your own drive shall be considered "abnormal" - and cloud storage will likely be the standard - like it is immediately with money vs bank accounts, for instance. This will open the door to complete management of your saved knowledge, mechanically blocking materials about - for instance - the aforementioned bombs. Another, maybe more plausible possibility, could be punishing the people who add such files - like film producers did with folks downloading certain torrents.

Google

How do most individuals discover data on the internet? Using Google, of course. But Google is one thing more than only a search engine - it is a company whose goal is gathering as a lot knowledge as possible and making a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for example, google analytics) exist just about on each site - you possibly can even not know what Google is, but still be spied on. That data is then used to, for example, present you focused advertisements, but also different search outcomes. So a Christian looking for "abortion" will see something else than an atheist.

Google went further and invented a brand new algorithm for displaying search outcomes. The sites who are, in response to them, primarily based on "information" will probably be higher up. Alternatively, those that comprise unfaithful data (once more, according to them) will likely be additional down. One of the ways Google rates the reality worth of web sites is evaluating them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we know the way Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we will assume they will pushed away by official versions of occasions. Soon, after we search for something like "genetically modified organisms" we will solely get "prepared" information. Google's invention might change into one among the most effective instruments of censorship and opinion management.

Google also controls other common companies. One in every of the preferred is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they bought it. I used to be surprised when just a few years in the past I couldn't log in to my YouTube account without making a Gmail account. I did not want their e-mail (which spies on you) so I stated goodbye to YouTube. I did not use it much, however nonetheless.

Another YouTube reform is called Content ID. It is supposed to guard copyright. The creator of a film or song can share their creation with Google, which will then evaluate it with every other file on YouTube. If it considers a type of files close sufficient to the submission, it is going to both delete that file, remove sound from it, or add commercials.

- Nintendo was able to place advertisements on some movies showcasing their video games: http://www.destructoid.com/nintendo-is-claiming-possession-of-let-s-play-videos-253793.phtml (archive) (MozArchive)- An individual uploaded some birds singing. Content ID assumed it was some copyright protected track, and added commercials to it, which earned the creator of the nonexistent song cash. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120227/00152917884/man-will get-bogus-youtube-copyright-claim-birds-singing-background.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- Some company even put advertisements on another person's music, and earned money from it: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/10513630347/umg-licenses-indie-artists-monitor-then-makes use of-content-id-to-declare-possession-it.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)

Before Content ID was invented, somebody who thought that a film violates copyright, had to send YouTube a kind, which may very well be accepted or not. Nowadays although, they've a a lot simpler approach referred to as Content ID, which permits them to earn cash if it finds some similarities. You'll be able to theoretically enchantment a Content ID decision, but it is pointless because the appeal will likely be determined by...the identical firm that uploaded the file. Many frustrated individuals are complaining in internet feedback, saying that Content ID is horrible, that it made a mistake with their film, that they are stealing their cash, that they have misplaced their files or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI typically. Some individuals have mentioned that movie or music creators needs to be comfortable to have their content material shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist only because Content ID occurred. Without it, folks may freely share their films without them being possibly modified / deleted by automated analysis.

An identical program may very well be used to delete films about undesirable matters. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even if often that is just an excuse; but they have to do it by hand. In the event that they put collectively Content ID with the positioning sorting algorithm, they may create a system that deletes certain content mechanically. A extra advanced type of that algorithm could even delete sure components of films which have undesirable matters (for example, deleting a number of second lengthy part with a racist slur). It could work much like the profanity filters on forums. Nevertheless it would not be restricted only to that - Google has shown, that they are very concerned about controlling your beliefs, once they've created the location sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A software that might detect the place in your film an undesirable matter is mentioned, and change it with their modified model, can be very welcome of their arsenal.

You could write a whole guide about Google; I do not wish to do it - but I should briefly mention another things they've executed. Recaptcha is the most well-liked approach to defend boards from spambots. When you needed to jot down something on a discussion board with recaptcha, you needed to type a certain word. You did not at all times get a word, although - you may get something like a avenue deal with, which might then get added to Google StreetView, which allows spying on people. For years, anybody who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with avenue addresses, while not essentially understanding about that. What actually is StreetView? Google cars journey the world taking photos of every little thing and everybody. Then they put these images of their database, which can be searched by anybody. Google has access to photos of the entire Earth, just about - and even to the history of locations individuals seek for using their maps. What may that data be used for? You possibly can read on Wikipedia that a variety of countries had a problem with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privateness. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to allow it. Isn't this proof that we're coping with a worldwide plan to spy on individuals?

They've changed ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of photos and you have to choose those containing a certain item, for instance hamburgers. This is used to train Google's synthetic intelligence, which will also most likely be used towards us in the future. I will end this part with a quote from Google We don't need you to sort at all. We know the place you might be. We all know where you've got been. We can more or less know what you're interested by.

Social networks

One of the preferred web sites nowadays are social networks, resembling Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with information resembling identify, surname, telephone quantity, place of work, interests, and buddy lists. They do not have an issue with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it very easy, since the Like! button seems on hottest websites, and clicking it sends data to Facebook concerning the article you favored. How may they use that data? For example, for displaying focused advertisements. A few years ago, Facebook promised that it could by no means do this - however then modified their mind and it is now a actuality. A few of these advertisements might be insulting - for instance, an individual suffering from cancer, after searching for details about it on the internet, was proven advertisements about...burial providers! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privateness_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)

Comments written on these social networks are much more dangerous. They are attached to your actual name, and whoever finds your account can learn them. What might be the results of that? You can lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:

- An individual was arrested for posting lyrics of a heavy metallic music on Twitter. The federal government thought he was actually threatening to kill individuals and he was arrested. This incident was described intimately here: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140906/13490628443/heavy-steel-lyrics-posted-to-fb-end result-arrest-terrorist-threats.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A waitress lost their job forty eight hours after complaining on Facebook that she's earning too little in ideas. http://www.inc.com/news/articles/2010/05/waitress-fired-for-facebook-put up.html (archive) (MozArchive)

We might be focusing on singular conditions - was somebody punished appropriately or not? You could even blame the victim. But the logical thing to do is to take a look at the entire difficulty from afar. If these feedback were made in person, and never on the web, nobody might have gotten in trouble. The possibility of punishing somebody is the consequence of the technology that attaches the stuff you put up to your name. After years of utilizing social networks, you can find something on anybody, even if he did not suppose that the message he is writing would have given him problems later.

300 employers have been asked whether they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an worker due to something he had in his profile. Some of the offending things have been: unfavourable opinions about previous employers, photos of using medication or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" photographs.

There are also more direct ways that the social networks can have an effect on you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to show that you would be able to management human minds without knowing them personally, and without their data. 689003 individuals (who weren't conscious of being lab rats) had been divided into two groups - one in every of them was shown solely content material generating constructive feelings, the opposite - solely unfavorable. The extra constructive content material somebody saw, the more positively he himself responded. The variations have been small, however possibly they could be increased with more drastic measures. For instance, displaying somebody articles about murders or kidnappings. You could also target the content material someone was going to be shown individually - primarily based upon the issues he's written in his profile, or his searching history (which Facebook collects through the Like! buttons). If somebody reads a lot of anti-government web sites, they could be proven articles about the government doing one thing dangerous. Or an anti-GMO individual can be shown information about GMOs being legalized somewhere. It's plausible that this experiment opened the door to simply this sort of thing. You'll be able to learn the whole experiment here: http://www.pnas.org/content material/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive)

Facebook also makes use of an algorithm for detecting faces on photographs and automatically including a name to them. http://www.dailydot.com/expertise/fb-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). If your name is on a minimum of one photograph, each other picture together with your face might be detected as you.

Communication and encryption

Increasingly human communication is done electronically. This has the same downside as financial institution accounts - you pay for a primary human need. But that's not the most important. A human talking eye to eye is spontaneous. He is aware of solely the individual he's talking to can hear him. Then he brings that attitude towards speaking within the cellphone, which follows different guidelines - all knowledge about when, where, and to whom you made the decision is stored in the provider's database. In most countries the police has access to the info if they have the court order. But in Great Britain - the leader of digital spying - three of four most used suppliers send all their knowledge to police in real time: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/computerized-police-access-clients-mobile-cellphone-records-like-money-machine-ripa-three-ee-vodafone/ (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are huge - the same organization (the police) who can tremendous or punish you, now has access to all of your phone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages earlier than, but usually they needed to physically search their telephones. This requirement disappears with the automatic system of sending messages to police.

The identical is true of internet communication. Most individuals use frequent instruments like Gmail or Skype. In one among his leaked paperwork, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program referred to as PRISM, with which those corporations cooperate. Since 2011, Skype gives access to your conversations to the NSA, together with video recording:

After all, we may use less popular software program with an encryption capability, but would that protect us from spying?

David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, came up with an idea to ban encryption, arguing that There ought to be no technique of communication, which we can not read. Many individuals laughed, saying that the government would have to delete encryption software from people's onerous drives (and would that really be a problem for them? Malware exists, you realize). Others thought that they can't implement it, because it would make banking and such insecure. But this seems more like a determined option to dismiss the likelihood that, in the near future, all our conversations achieved electronically will be spied on by the federal government.

In one other leak of NSA's paperwork, it was proven that they need to scale back the effectiveness of frequent encryption:

You don't need to work with a software's creator to spy on our conversations, though. Even in open source software (that anybody with sufficient information and dedication can examine), there nonetheless happen bugs that may weaken the encryption. For instance, OpenSSL, the most popular library encrypting our communications with websites, for 1.5 years had a bug allowing to obtain a small amount of information from the reminiscence of the server that it's used on, and that information could embody passwords and encryption keys. NSA, in fact, took benefit of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-shoppers (archive) (MozArchive) Another instance: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anybody with enough functionality to decrypt communication made with it. And NSA has these capabilities - additionally they save all encrypted communications, to allow them to decrypt it later.

And they will most probably succeed - there is a huge likelihood that quantum computers will make all present ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so personal conversations might be a thing of the previous. Add to that voice recognition software program, and we're discovering ourselves in a world where all our conversations are looked for sure phrases (by a program similar to Content ID I've talked about earlier).

Electronic banking

Cash payments are increasingly usually being replaced by digital ones. People like the consolation of with the ability to order something they want and pay for it with a few clicks. Having a checking account is one thing normal today, even required. But behind the curtain hide gigantic implications for human privateness and freedom.

Let's begin from the basics - what is electronic cash? It's a quantity in a database on a server belonging to the bank you're utilizing. Your ability to buy anything relies on how big that quantity is - and since humans must, for instance, eat - your life relies on it. How a lot electronic cash you will have relies on a variety of belongings you cannot affect - simply using a checking account costs cash, so participating on this system means you mechanically lose it.

A financial institution can eat far more of your money - even with out bearing in mind hacking attacks like this: https://thehackernews.com/2016/05/swift-banking-hack.html (archive) (MozArchive), where the hackers stole 12 million dollars. One man from Cyprus received 720 000 Euros stolen by the european commission to pay off Cyprus' debt. He needed to hearth all his Cypriot employees and transfer to another nation. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it altogether from his account. And, as he himself says, Thousands of other corporations round Cyprus have the same state of affairs. This exhibits how much you possibly can rely on a number in a database - all it takes is one thought in somebody's thoughts, and it's gone. Read more about this subject here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?subject=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)

Another downside with electronic payments is the fact that they are anti-privateness. All your transactions are stored within the financial institution's database. And the folks controlling the financial institution can use it towards you - blocking unwanted transactions, akin to shopping for bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit score-playing cards/naughty-things-credit-card-wont-buy-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It is easy to think about a world where all your transactions are analyzed and mechanically blocked in line with a listing of banned objects.

Paper money doesn't have that problem. It won't disappear from your pocket. There isn't any central level that stores information about your transactions. You cannot "flip somebody off" if he pays with paper money - if someone would not wish to sell you something, you go somewhere else. Paper money is a tool of the free individual - that is why the elites are concentrating on it.

But you can still use paper money, right? Maybe not for long - they've been making an attempt to get people used to digital funds for a long time. Advertising bank accounts is commonplace. Increasingly employers require having a bank account. The boundaries on the amount you may spend without delay with paper money are going down worldwide:

Will they go all the way down to zero? In some places that's already the case; for instance, buses in London can't be paid for in money since 3 years in the past. The amount of cashless places will enhance, and people might be tied up in the digital net of slavery.

2017 update: since writing the above, the scenario has obtained a lot worse. In Sweden, funds are almost fully electronic: https://www.theguardian.com/enterprise/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-playing cards-cellphone-apps-leading-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses haven't taken cash for years, it's unattainable to buy a ticket on the Stockholm metro with money, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and road vendors - and even churches - increasingly choose card or phone payments.

In November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eliminated the two largest notes, which elevated the quantity of debit card payments by 108%. Within the radio he said Less-cash first, cashless society subsequent. There are many different examples in numerous international locations, equivalent to Denmark, the USA, and many others. There's little doubt we're dealing with a worldwide plan to destroy money.

CCTV cameras

The strongest weapon of the technological management system are positively the CCTV cameras. While you possibly can largely avoid all the opposite issues (not less than for now), the cameras are doing their job simply by current. They have been slowly being put into numerous locations - from shops and faculties to the streets, buses and flats; you possibly can assume that wherever you progress, your life is being stored, watched and analyzed by strangers. I've known a spot where some drunks liked to satisfy up and they put a digicam in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the following day they replaced it again, so it is clearly very important to them.

The existence of the spying system fully changes the relations between folks and the elites. You cannot really feel comfortable figuring out that your each move is being spied on (by individuals who can also punish you should you do one thing they deem "mistaken"). Most individuals don't seem to care though - they buy in shops loaded with cameras and ship their youngsters to varsities which have cameras. Some are even comfortable that they are being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "security", or different excuses that have nothing to do with reality. But that is simply the start - the effectiveness of the spying system will enhance a lot that you won't have the ability to dwell the way you at all times have. So what's the subsequent section of this system?

Advanced cameras can do rather more than just recording video and counting on the human's interpretation. They will spy on a human as he goes from one camera's range to a different's, detect faces, mark individuals in line with gender or other standards:

They may also detect your habits and mark it as doubtlessly "suspicious". This is already being used in places like India https://www.nice.com/defending/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-Nice-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.nice.com/protecting/press-releases/Nice-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even within the Polish town Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)

This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There's a central point during which the police can analyze all the information. One of the "suspicious behaviors" that had been being advertised by the CCTV firms was taking out a pistol out of your pocket. But something at all could be thought-about "suspicious". Let's look at some of the widespread issues that I've seen being banned: promoting stuff on the streets, feeding birds, carrying a mask, strolling the dog (!), driving without seat belts, and so on. Sometimes individuals get fined for these things, but they must be came upon first. The intelligent monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites fantastic anybody for something they think about.

Imagine you're walking via an alley that's loaded with these cameras whereas consuming a sandwich. You then throw away the bag wherein the sandwich was. A camera sees that and assigns you a superb of fifty dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the trail you take is now being watched and despatched to the police in real time. A few minutes later the police comes; you are attempting to cover however it's not possible, since there are cameras in all places, they usually know your place. Ultimately, you pay up, the same as anybody who has ever littered. This could look humorous now, but the know-how exists to make this scenario a actuality, it's only a matter of implementing it. The commercials for these cameras make it clear - being in the crowd will not protect you. Neither will hiding your face, altering clothes, moving somewhere, and many others. People will for sure attempt to discover a strategy to fool this system, and they could even succeed at first - however the algorithms will get better, and can ultimately make it unimaginable to idiot them.

Inventions of the longer term

There are different applied sciences, which have been lately invented, that sooner or later will fuel the control system. Pretty much every new invention has the potential to do this (and even is invented for this reason), but I will attempt to explain the most important ones.

Microchips

There is an enormous marketing campaign all over the world to place chips in people's pets, allegedly to "be capable of finding them", however really the point is to get folks used to the idea of chipping. After which they may chip the folks. In some bars or workplaces they're already getting used to, for example, open doors; after sufficient propaganda they are going to be injected in every baby that is born. They may substitute ID cards, credit playing cards, and different current paperwork. They will be required in an increasing number of locations, and you will not be capable to fulfill primary wants (such as purchasing) without them. Why do the elites need to chip the folks so dangerous? Because it's going to enable them to create a gigantic database containing the time and place of each individual. This has already been tried in some American faculties, for instance: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/youngsters-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-expertise-faculties-use-monitor-all the pieces-youngsters-do (archive) (MozArchive). The children put on ID playing cards on their necks, and those playing cards have the chips in them. Their position is being despatched to the varsity computer systems in real time, as well as detecting events akin to entering or leaving college, buying lunch, or getting into the library. It's solely a matter of time until all of us have them underneath our skins.

Holograms

Advertisements have been with us for a long time, even earlier than expertise. You'll be able to avoid them by installing AdBlock or switching to a different Tv channel. But you won't be able to cover from an commercial displayed, for instance, on grass or the sky. I assumed that is far into the future before I wrote this article, however truly, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-advertising-marketing campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive) This may be used not solely to promote merchandise, but convince folks of the truth of a certain model of events.

Self-driving vehicles

Already being tested in, for example, California https://www.bloomberg.com/information/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-vehicles-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they will lastly be put into roads, we'll keep listening to about how secure they're (this already happens, however will be far more common). When people finally get convinced of the security of these vehicles, regular automobiles shall be banned since they are allegedly much less safe than the computer-managed ones. So we will be able to drive solely according to the path the computer chooses, which can of course even be saved in the global database. Cars and not using a steering wheel (already exist) may also stop fleeing from the police.

Culmination of the technological control system

The final intention of the technological control system is placing collectively all these tools to permit full management of humanity. To make use of the Internet, you will have to give your real identify (or maybe flash a microchip?) - so Anything we do there will likely be related to our actual particular person. All encrypted connections and conversations will be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents and even making jokes like "die in a fireplace" might be a thing of the previous. All the data you obtain will likely be controlled - much like what Facebook and Google already do, but globally.

Our physical position will likely be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which will likely be in locations akin to retailers, airports, flats, etc. So our movements shall be analyzed in actual time - however not by folks, like it is now, but by AI (and even robots, farther in the future). You will not be capable of flee from this system - they will even spy on the homeless (there have been already applications to find and catalogue the homeless' place, allegedly to help them, but it actually was about the spying). Maybe they'll quickly put cameras in their favorite places, if they don't seem to be already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they're already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/security-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-inhabitants/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't assume it could get there so fast!

Paper cash will absolutely disappear. All our transactions shall be linked to our real name, as every thing else. There will be a large, worldwide database storing the physical position of each particular person, in addition to every thing he has ever accomplished, said, wrote, bought...All his movements will, of course, be analyzed in actual time by AI. I feel the expertise for all that already exists - so it is a social or logistical drawback, not a technological one. How long will it take the elites to put in all that, and get folks used to slavery? I don't know. But one thing is for certain: the comfy life that you're used to, might be solely a contented reminiscence quickly.

Update 2022: somehow I felt like updating this, since I think I did not make my important point as successfully as I wished to. So, imagine a video sport character, like Mario. By interacting with the game, we are able to verify how high he can leap, how lengthy does it take him to reach full running pace, what kinds of enemies he can stomp on and which he cannot, and so forth. Since Mario is only a program running on our computers / consoles, we can learn all that he can do at any second. His leap height is a continuing, so we can theoretically calculate whether he can hit some block, or in how a lot time (in-sport frames) a certain enemy will attain us. Greater than that - by understanding the particulars of the game, we are able to determine what's the perfect course of action 5 levels down the street.

That is, in reality, how extremely precise speedruns are created. For easy video games like Super Mario Bros, they're already very optimized, virtually right down to a single step. But the identical guidelines apply to even complex games like JRPGs. Picking up a certain merchandise early on can can help you do something 2 hours later. Learning a sure talent that's weak at the start can let you kill the final boss in one hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a certain optimum value, and so forth. To a regular player, these strategies might seem stupid in the quick time period, however they finalize in the absolute best route ultimately. It's not just about speedruns, however any form of challenge runs, etc. would require deep information and long run analysis of the game mechanics to perform.

Now what if I told you that reality is the video recreation in query? Imagine - your location is already identified by your smartphone, or car, or an online of CCTV, or a mix of these. Your deepest darkest needs are recognized by your search engines like google and yahoo, your community of pals by the social media providers, etc. Just this alone allows big information, prediction and control skills (this has been described within the previous sections). But imagine we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, smart cities and stuff like that. With growing technology, we develop into extra just like the video recreation character.

To reach that level, we require three things. First is the expertise that enables us exact enough information assortment. Second is highly effective computers that enable calculations quick enough to predict outputs based on inputs long forward in time (what chess engines already do, however in a much more difficult system). The third is the know-how that permits us to push switches - the way a keyboard or joystick does in a video sport system. See, we're still bodily beings, dependent on issues like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones entering a cell to cause certain adjustments, etc. All of this could possibly be theoretically managed by expertise. Even now, with the relatively easy switches that we've got, we will already cause depression in social media users by exhibiting them sure tales. We will get people to buy things because of AI-determined direct advertisements, and so on. Imagine if we get all the way down to the level of the cell!

And the elites are surely working on such a technology as we converse. I imply, what do you suppose the mRNA vaccines are? Now I suppose a few of this could be used positively, but it in some way by no means is in the present world, so it's a fool's dream. The principle level is, we are going to lose our humanity both means, when the evaluation and control means reaches Mario's level. We must either decide to inhibit such a expertise, or give up our humanity, since e.g mendacity won't be doable with neuron entry. Hey, perhaps you think that humans will resolve to hand over superior expertise. Forget about it, Ted Kaczynski has long disproved such a notion - technology develops pretty much by itself, without regard to human hopes and dreams.

And that is why we need the bodily infrastructure quickly. If the world is controlled by evil actors (as it is right now) and they've all this functionality (which we don't), including direct cell access, God help us. The higher the technology, the larger the facility distinction between us and the elites. Resistance is not going to be possible anymore when know-how reaches such a level (which I would guess takes not more than a few a long time). Imagine them being in a position to indicate a graph of your most likely movements according to the data they have already got, in real time, and use it towards you. How can you resist, when the computers can predict what you are going to do on Level 6 of the truth sport - and push a switch to deny or change it? You will never do anything aside from what the elites (or the AI, whether it is given control and goes rogue) allow. And since the technological development won't stop, we need to take over right now.

For more in regards to xfans.tube have a look at our page.